Coyle

Fred Feleki Martinez v. Coyle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20251:24-cv-00958California1,797 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-958-BAM (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

9 v. ACTION 10 COYLE, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

11 Defendant. STATE A CLAIM 12 (ECF No. 15)

13 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 14 Plaintiff Fred Feleki Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 15 forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s 16 complaint and granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is currently before the 17 Court for screening. (ECF No. 15.) 18

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

19 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 20 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.