Hector Martin Prieto v. John Doe 1 and John Doe 2

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20251:25-cv-00650California792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR MARTIN PRIETO, Case No. 1:25-cv-00650-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER NOTING PLAINTIFF’S

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNDER FED. R.

v. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) AND FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) OF CERTAIN CLAIMS JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2, (Doc. No. 18) Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO

CORRECT THE CAPTION 17 18 Plaintiff Hector Martin Prieto, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Second Amended Complaint on August 21, 2025. (Doc. No. 14, “SAC”). On September 2, 2025, the Court screened the SAC and found it stated cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 in their individual capacities stemming from Defendants actions when responding to Plaintiff’s medical emergency on November 9, 2024, but no other claims. (Doc. No. 16 at 9-10). Specifically, the Court found the SAC did not state any cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.