Joseph Perez v. County of San Joaquin, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH PEREZ, Case No. 2:24-cv-3402-TLN-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The court previously granted defendants’ motion to compel and ordered plaintiff to 18 provide, by no later than August 28, 2025, further responses to discovery. ECF Nos. 22 & 26. 19 On September 3, 2025, defendants moved for sanctions against plaintiff for failure to comply 20 with the order granting their motion to compel. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff failed to timely respond to 21 that motion. Accordingly, on September 24, 2025, the court continued the hearing on defendants’ 22 motion for sanctions and ordered plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for 23 his failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 30. The court also ordered plaintiff 24 file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion by no later than October 25 16, 2025, and warned…