Joseph Perez v. County of San Joaquin, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20252:24-cv-03402California1,006 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH PEREZ, Case No. 2:24-cv-3402-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., Defendants. 16 The court previously granted defendants’ motion to compel and ordered plaintiff to provide, by no later than August 28, 2025, further responses to discovery. ECF Nos. 22 & 26. On September 3, 2025, defendants moved for sanctions against plaintiff for failure to comply with the order granting their motion to compel. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff failed to timely respond to that motion. Accordingly, on September 24, 2025, the court continued the hearing on defendants’ motion for sanctions and ordered plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 30. The court also ordered plaintiff file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion by no later than October 16, 2025, and warned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.