LucidWorks

Tahtiana Jade Brown v. Lucidworks, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20252:25-cv-00607California1,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAHTIANA JADE BROWN, No. 2:25-cv-0607-DC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LUCIDWORKS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Tahtiana Brown filed this case without counsel and this matter is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants Lucidworks, Inc., Hammett, Pascuzzi, Kirby, and Sinoway have filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (ECF No. 78.) This motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, the motion should be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with a complaint filed on February 21, 2025, asserting seven causes of action against multiple defendants. (ECF No. 1.) The defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff’s claims and the district judge assigned to this case dismissed the complaint on July 29, 2025. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.