David Taylor v. Placer County, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID TAYLOR, No. 2:25-cv-2329-DC-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 PLACER COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff David Taylor filed a pro se complaint and the matter was referred to the 18 undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On September 15, 2025, 19 the undersigned found the complaint failed to state a claim and dismissed the complaint with 20 leave to amend. (ECF No. 5.) The undersigned ordered that plaintiff was to file any amended 21 complaint within 30 days of the date of that order. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff was specifically cautioned 22 that failure to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the order would result in a 23 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to file an amended 24 complaint has expired. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, sought an extension of time 25 to do so, or otherwise communicated with the court. 26 …