Edlow

Deepa Dinesh Gaikwad v. Joseph B. Endlow, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20252:25-cv-02885California289 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEEPA DINESH GAIKWAD, No. 2:25-cv-02885-DAD-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOSEPH B. ENDLOW, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Plaintiff filed the operative complaint on October 7, 2025. See ECF No. 1. On November 4, 2025, Defendants filed a motion to stay the case in light of the lapse in appropriations. See ECF No. 6. Defendants requested 60 days from the date appropriations are restored to respond to the complaint and for suspension of all other deadlines and appearances. See id. On November 12, 2025, the government enacted a continuing resolution that extends funding.1 See Congressional Bill H.R. 5371. As such, Defendants’ motion for stay is moot. In light of the lapse of appropriations and the timeline of this case, the undersigned will grant Defendants 60 days from the date of restoration of appropriations funding to respond to the complaint. 27 1 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.