William H. Brandstatt v. Clark, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM H. BRANDSTATT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01600-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE

14 CLARK, et al., TO PROSECUTE 15 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 30, 32, 35) 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 I. Background 19 Plaintiff William H. Brandstatt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 On August 27, 2025, the Court screened the first amended complaint and found that it 22 failed to state any claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 30.) The Court granted 23 Plaintiff leave to either file a second amended complaint, notify the Court that he wishes to stand 24 on the first amended complaint, or voluntarily dismiss this case, within twenty-one (21) days. 25 (Id.) Plaintiff was granted…