Tremaine Carroll, et al. v. State of California, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREMAINE CARROLL, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00627 JLT EPG (PC) Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION1 OF DISMISSAL
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PAY THE FILING FEE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., (Doc. 15) Defendants. 16 On February 27, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee for this action within 30 days. (Doc. 11.) Despite the Court’s warning that failure to comply with the order would result in dismissal (id. at 3), Plaintiff failed to pay the required filing fees. Plaintiff instead objected to the Court’s order, asserting that she received it late because “CDCR is circumventing [Plaintiff’s] due process rights.” (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff also stated that she is “in dispute with two law firms that are supposed to be representing her and should have been doing so in this matter.” (Id.) Plaintiff concluded by requesting 90 days to pay the filing fee. (Id.) On April 28, 2025, after considering the…