XL Specialty Insurance Company v. Godfather Express, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20251:24-cv-01451California5,029 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE Case No. 1:24-cv-01451-KES-BAM

COMPANY,

12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff, REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 13 FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. 14 (Doc. 20)

GODFATHER EXPRESS, INC.,

15 FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 16 17 18 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff XL Specialty Insurance Company’s 19 (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Godfather Express, Inc. 20 (“Defendant”).1 (Doc. 25.) The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Defendant did not file an opposition to the motion, and the 22 time in which to do so has passed. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition . . . to the granting of the motion 23 shall be in writing and shall be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the motion 24 was filed.”) 25

1 Plaintiff initially named Dhawan Transport as a co-defendant in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.