Tremaine Carroll v. Sean Diddy Combs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREMAINE CARROLL, Case No. 1:25-cv-0080 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART CONSTRUED

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION1;

v. REINSTATING MAY 1, 2025 FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING

SEAN DIDDY COMBS, SAME; DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS; REQUIRING

Defendants. PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE Thirty-Day Deadline (Doc. 20.) 18 Tremaine Carroll initiated this action by filing a complaint asserting violations of her constitutional rights and requested to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 7.) On May 1, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to deny the request to proceed in forma pauperis because Plaintiff is a “three-striker” and did not satisfy the imminent danger exception set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 17.) However, though the Court served the Findings and Recommendations on…