Tremaine Carroll v. Sean Diddy Combs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TREMAINE CARROLL, Case No. 1:25-cv-0080 JLT EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART CONSTRUED

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION1;

13 v. REINSTATING MAY 1, 2025 FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING

14 SEAN DIDDY COMBS, SAME; DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS; REQUIRING

15 Defendants. PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE 16 Thirty-Day Deadline 17 (Doc. 20.) 18 19 Tremaine Carroll initiated this action by filing a complaint asserting violations of her 20 constitutional rights and requested to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 7.) On May 1, 2025, 21 the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to deny the request to 22 proceed in forma pauperis because Plaintiff is a “three-striker” and did not satisfy the imminent 23 danger exception set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 17.) However, though the Court served 24 the Findings and Recommendations on…