Young

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Anietra Young

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20251:25-cv-00559California1,152 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:25-cv-00559-JLT-HBK

COMPANY,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE Plaintiff, SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION v. FOURTEEN-DAY RESPONSE PERIOD

ANIETRA YOUNG,

15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the Court sua sponte following a review of Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 11) and the Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Because this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction is not clearly established on the face of the Complaint, Plaintiff Metropolitan Life Insurance Company will be allowed an opportunity to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action by filing a Complaint against Defendant Anietra Young (“Defendant”), seeking to recover funds 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.