McCamey

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROYALTON MCCAMEY, Case No. 1:25-cV-01561-JLT-HBK 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER 13 v. DECEMBER 15, 2025 DEADLINE 14 GOOGLE, ALAMEDA NEWS GROUP, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Royalton McCamey, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis initiated 18 this action on November 14, 2025, by filing a form “Complaint for a Civil Case.” (Doc. No. 1, 19 “complaint”). Plaintiff’s complaint is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 1915(e)(2)(B). 21 I. Screening Requirement 22 Because Plaintiff is proceeding in form pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case “at any 23 time” if the Court determines, inter alia, the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state claim 24 on which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from 25 such relief. 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) -(iii); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F. 3d 1122, 1129 26 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 1915(e) applies to all litigants…