McCamey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROYALTON MCCAMEY, Case No. 1:25-cV-01561-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. DECEMBER 15, 2025 DEADLINE GOOGLE, ALAMEDA NEWS GROUP, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Royalton McCamey, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis initiated this action on November 14, 2025, by filing a form “Complaint for a Civil Case.” (Doc. No. 1, “complaint”). Plaintiff’s complaint is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). I. Screening Requirement Because Plaintiff is proceeding in form pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case “at any time” if the Court determines, inter alia, the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state claim on which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) -(iii); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F. 3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 1915(e) applies to all litigants…