UShip

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEVON KEITH WEBB, No. 2:25-cv-2043 DJC AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 USHIP and GoDADDY., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On September 23, 19 2025, the court granted plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application but rejected the 20 complaint, granting plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was 21 cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. 22 Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On October 29, 2025, the court 23 issued an order to show cause by November 12, 2025 why this case should not be dismissed for 24 failure to prosecute. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any 25 action to prosecute this case. 26 In recommending…