Rodrigo Edward Bejarano, III v. Andre Gonzales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20252:25-cv-02574California230 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODRIGO EDWARD BEJARANO, III, No. 2:25-cv-02574-EFB (PC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANDRE GONZALES, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. 19 The application attacks a conviction issued by the Santa Clara County Superior Court. 20 While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was 21 convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any 22 and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s application are more 23 readily available in Santa Clara County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// ] Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 This matter is transferred to the United States District Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.