Lindsey Shaw v. City of Portola, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LINDSEY SHAW, No. 2:25-CV-02461-DJC-DMC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. And 14 CITY OF PORTOLA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the 18 Court is Defendants Bonk, City of Portola, Gross, Kennedy, Murphy, and Scarlett’s motion to 19 dismiss. See ECF No. 5. Defendant Kennedy Solutions, Inc. joined the motion to dismiss. See 20 ECF No. 16. Plaintiff filed an opposition, ECF No. 10, deemed timely by the undersigned. See 21 ECF No. 15. Defendants filed a reply. See ECF No. 18. 22 Plaintiff additionally informed the Court that she mailed a motion for clarification 23 regarding defense representation to the Court for docketing and to Defendants. At the time of this 24 order, that motion has not yet appeared on the docket. Nonetheless, the undersigned will set a 25 briefing schedule for that motion. Defendants, who indicated they received…