Perrielin Sessions v. Solano County Health and Social Services, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERRIELIN SESSIONS, No. 2:25-cv-2936-DAD-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER
SOLANO COUNTY HEALTH AND
SOCIAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants.
18 Plaintiff Perrielin Sessions proceeds without counsel and seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff initiated this action with a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Presently, the applicable court costs include a $350.00 filing fee and $55.00 administrative fee. The court may authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees” by an individual who submits an affidavit evidencing an inability to pay such fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). “An affidavit in support of an IFP application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787…