Perrielin Sessions v. Solano County Health and Social Services, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PERRIELIN SESSIONS, No. 2:25-cv-2936-DAD-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14
SOLANO COUNTY HEALTH AND
15 SOCIAL SERVICES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17
18 19 Plaintiff Perrielin Sessions proceeds without counsel and seeks to proceed in forma 20 pauperis. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff initiated this action with a complaint and an application to proceed in forma 22 pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 23 Presently, the applicable court costs include a $350.00 filing fee and $55.00 administrative 24 fee. The court may authorize the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees” by an 25 individual who submits an affidavit evidencing an inability to pay such fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 26 “An affidavit in support of an IFP application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot 27 pay the court costs and still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787…