Guillen
Julian J. Alexander v. Foster, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
22 On October 10, 2025, Defendants submitted documents they have withheld pursuant to 23 the official information privilege, specifically: 1. Incident Commander’s Review/Critique (AGOPRIV000001-AGOPRIV000003); 2. Manager’s Review-First Level (AGOPRIV000004-AGOPRIV000005); 3. Manager’s Review-Second Level (AGOPRIV000006-AGOPRIV000007); 4. IERC Executive Review Committee (“IERC”) Critique and Qualitative Evaluation (AGOPRIV000008-AGOPRIV000009); 5. IERC Use of Force Review & Further Action Recommendation (AGOPRIV000010- AGOPRIV000013); and 6. Incident Report Summary generated from CDCR’s internal SOMS on September 16, 2025 (AGOPRIV000014-AGOPRIV000017). Defendants argue that these documents are subject to the official information privilege 5 because they were generated after the cell extraction for administrative review purposes by 6 individuals who were not present or directly involved in the incident. Defendants assert that 7 production of these documents could educate inmates about CSP's administrative review policies, 8 impede future administrative review, and subject staff to unwarranted claims…