Hector Martin Prieto v. John Doe 1 and John Doe 2

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20251:25-cv-00650California1,225 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR MARTIN PRIETO, Case No. 1:25-cv-00650-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AMENDEDING THE COURT’S

NOVEMBER 19, 2025 ORDER

v.

PLAINTIFF HAS 90 DAYS WITHIN WHICH

JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2, TO IDENTIFY JOHN DOE 1 AND JOHN

DOE

Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

SEND PLAINTIFF A COPY OF SUBPOENA

FORM AO 88B AND FORM USM-285

18 Hector Martin Prieto (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. BACKGROUND On August 21, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 14, “SAC”). Following screening and voluntary dismissal of non-cognizable claims, Plaintiff’s SAC proceeds on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 (“Doe Defendants”) in their individual capacities. (See Doc. Nos. 16, 18, 20). Plaintiff submitted a completed subpoena (AO 88B) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.