Hector Martin Prieto v. John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HECTOR MARTIN PRIETO, Case No. 1:25-cv-00650-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AMENDEDING THE COURT’S
NOVEMBER 19, 2025 ORDER
13 v.
PLAINTIFF HAS 90 DAYS WITHIN WHICH
14 JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2, TO IDENTIFY JOHN DOE 1 AND JOHN
DOE 2
15 Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
16 SEND PLAINTIFF A COPY OF SUBPOENA
FORM AO 88B AND FORM USM-285
17
18 19 Hector Martin Prieto (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis in this action. 21 BACKGROUND 22 On August 21, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 14, 23 “SAC”). Following screening and voluntary dismissal of non-cognizable claims, Plaintiff’s SAC 24 proceeds on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants John Doe 1 and 25 John Doe 2 (“Doe Defendants”) in their individual capacities. (See Doc. Nos. 16, 18, 20). 26 Plaintiff submitted a completed subpoena (AO 88B) and…