CDCR

Tarrence Woodard v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20252:25-cv-02433California264 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TARRENCE WOODARD, No. 2:25-cv-2433 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ORDER AND

CORRECTIONS AND

15 REHABILITATION, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Defendants. 17 18 On October 8, 2025, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. 19 The second amended complaint was due on November 10, 2025, and plaintiff has not filed a 20 second amended complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.