Acquisto

Scott Andrew Morrison v. Steven Acquisto, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20252:25-cv-02723California259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT ANDREW MORRISON, No. 2:25-cv-2723 CKD P Plaintiff, v. STEVEN ACQUISTO, et al., ORDER AND Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 On October 7, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The amended complaint was due on November 10, 2025, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.