Casanova

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE LEIVA, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00738-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT MANSOUP SHOULD NOT

13 v. BE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR

A FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT

14 I. CASANOVA, et al.,

INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE

15 Defendants. SERVICE

16 30-DAY DEADLINE

17

18

19 Plaintiff Andre Leiva is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. 20 The case proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical 21 needs claims against Defendants I. Casanova, Y. Mansoup, and Pallimina. 22

I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND

23 On September 11, 2025, Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin issued his Order Directing 24 Service of Complaint. (Doc. 12.) 25 On September 30, 2025, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 26 (CDCR) filed its notice of intent to waive service as to Defendants Casanova and Pallimina. 27 (Docs. 14 [sealed].) That same date, CDCR filed a notice…