Casanova
Andre Leiva v. I. Casanova, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE LEIVA, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00738-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANT MANSOUP SHOULD NOT
v. BE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR
A FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT
I. CASANOVA, et al.,
INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE
Defendants. SERVICE
30-DAY DEADLINE
19 Plaintiff Andre Leiva is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. 20 The case proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical 21 needs claims against Defendants I. Casanova, Y. Mansoup, and Pallimina.
I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND
23 On September 11, 2025, Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin issued his Order Directing 24 Service of Complaint. (Doc. 12.) 25 On September 30, 2025, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 26 (CDCR) filed its notice of intent to waive service as to Defendants Casanova and Pallimina. 27 (Docs. 14 [sealed].) That same date, CDCR filed a notice…