More
David More, et al. v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DAVID MORE, et al., No. 1:24-cv-00115-KES-SKO
11 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
12 v. (Doc. 42) 13 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,
14 Defendants. 15
16 17 On November 20, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 18 prejudice. (Doc. 42.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 19 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 20 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23 Dated: November 22, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 24
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25 26 27 28