FFB Bank v. Credit Mojo LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20251:24-cv-01580California6,994 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FFB BANK, Case No. 1:24-cv-01580-KES-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS THAT

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED IN PART AND ORDER CREDIT MOJO LLC, et al., VACATING HEARING 14 Defendants. (Doc. 23) 15 _________________________________ _ / OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS 16 I. INTRODUCTION On October 20, 2025, Plaintiff FFB Bank (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default judgment against Defendants Credit Mojo LLC (“Credit Mojo”), and Rondi R. Lambeth (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 23.) No opposition to Plaintiff’s motion was filed. The undersigned has reviewed the motion and supporting documentation and determines that the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). As such, the hearing on the motion set for December 10, 2025, shall be VACATED. For the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.