Pearline Jackson v. The State and Federal Law Enforcement Agencies, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20251:25-cv-00181California4,652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 PEARLINE JACKSON, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00181-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO v. ACTION

THE STATE AND FEDERAL LAW FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, et al., DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM

Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Pearline (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is currently before this Court for screening. (ECF No. 11.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.