Enriquez

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ANTONIO MARTINEZ, No. 1:25-cv-00854 JLT SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

13 v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS 14 RUBY ENRIQUEZ, et al., (Doc. 18)

15 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 3, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and 19 found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for sexual harassment in violation of the Eighth 20 Amendment against Defendant Ruby Enriquez but that his other claims against other defendants 21 were not cognizable as pled. (Doc. 15.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended 22 complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed only on the deliberate indifference claim. 23 (Id.) On October 23, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to proceed on the claim found to be 24 cognizable. (Doc. 16.) 25 On October 24,…