Enriquez

Jose Antonio Martinez v. Ruby Enriquez, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20251:25-cv-00854California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ANTONIO MARTINEZ, No. 1:25-cv-00854 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS RUBY ENRIQUEZ, et al., (Doc. 18)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 3, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for sexual harassment in violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendant Ruby Enriquez but that his other claims against other defendants were not cognizable as pled. (Doc. 15.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed only on the deliberate indifference claim. (Id.) On October 23, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to proceed on the claim found to be cognizable. (Doc. 16.) On October 24,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.