Hovhannes Margaryan v. Warden of California City Detention

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20251:25-cv-01582California550 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HOVHANNES MARGARYAN, No. 1:25-cv-01582-WBS-EFB (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA CITY

DETENTION,

15 Respondent. 16

17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has conducted a preliminary review of 19 the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 20 2254.1 Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of 21 constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to show cause why the writ should not 22 be granted by filing an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 23 2243. Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return within 7 days after being served a 24 copy of it. 25 //// 26

27 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.