Stephen Favis v. O-Film Global (HK) Trading Limited, A Corporation Under the Laws of Hong Kong, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHEN FAVIS, No. 2:25-cv-1082-DAD-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 O-FILM GLOBAL (HK) TRADING
LIMITED, A CORPORATION UNDER
15 THE LAWS OF HONG KONG, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in 20 accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21). On August 29, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiff’s 21 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and set a 30-day deadline for refiling 22 such application or paying the filing fee. ECF No. 3. On October 31, 2025, this Court issued an 23 order for Plaintiff to show cause within 14 days as to why this case should not be dismissed for 24 failure to prosecute by refiling the application or paying the filing fee. ECF No. 4. To date, 25 Plaintiff has not filed a new application to proceed IFP, paid the filing fee, or otherwise 26 responded to the order to show cause. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED…