Kimberly R. Olson v. Law Offices of Joseph M. Ahart, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:25-CV-00876-DJC-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH M. AHART, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 19 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. See ECF No. 7. Also 20 pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for 60-day extension. See ECF Nos. 10 and 11. 21 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by litigants who, as here, have 22 been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Under this 23 screening provision, the Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or 24 malicious; (2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief 25 from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Moreover, 26 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3), this Court…