Rosendo Gonzalez, Jr. v. Butte County, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSENDO GONZALEZ, Jr., Case No. 2:25-cv-1491-TLN-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BUTTE COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Rosendo Gonzalez, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action alleging 18 claims relating to his April 5, 2025 arrest. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 14, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff filed 23 objections on November 3, 2025 (ECF No. 12), which the Court has considered. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481…