(HC)Doe

John Doe v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20251:24-cv-00943California451 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JOHN DOE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00943-EPG-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST FOR COURT TO ORDER THAT

13 v. PETITIONER REMAIN DETAINED IN

EASTERN DISTRICT PENDING

14 CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., RESOLUTION OF PETITION

15 Respondents. (ECF No. 25)

16 17 Petitioner John Doe, represented by counsel, is a federal immigration detainee proceeding 18 with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The parties have 19 consented to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge. (ECF Nos. 4, 10, 11.) 20 On November 20, 2025, this Court granted Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus 21 and found that Petitioner’s release from detention is the appropriate remedy. (ECF No. 24.) On 22 November 25, 2025, the Court ordered Petitioner’s release on conditions. (ECF No. 27.) 23 On November 24, 2025, counsel for Petitioner submitted a declaration, stating that at 24 9:50 a.m. that morning, counsel received a panicked call from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

(HC)Doe · E.D. California · 2025 | Caselegis