Andrews

John Doe v. Tonya Andrews, Facility Administrator of Golden State Annex Detention Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20251:25-cv-00333California9,882 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN DOE, Case No. 1:25-cv-00333-JLT-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO

13 v. DISMISS2 14 TONYA ANDREWS, Facility (Doc. No. 10) Administrator of Golden State Annex 15 Detention Facility,1

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

16 Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner John Doe, an immigration detainee in U.S. Immigration Customs and 19 Enforcement (ICE) custody at the Golden State Annex Detention Facility in McFarland, 20 California, initiated this action by filing, with counsel, a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 21 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). The Petition raises the following claim for relief: 22 1 Respondent moves to strike and dismiss all unlawfully named officials under § 2241. (Doc. No. 10 at 1 23 n.2). The proper respondent in habeas cases is the “warden of the facility where the prisoner is held, not the Attorney General or some other remote supervisory official.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.