(SS)Prescott

Carrie Prescott v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20251:25-cv-01626California1,187 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARRIE PRESCOTT, Case No. 1:25-cv-01626-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO

ISSUE SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER,

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL AND CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

SECURITY, REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

15 Defendant. (Doc. 2) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Carrie Prescott (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on 19 November 24, 2025, seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 20 denying disability insurance and benefits. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead 21 filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). 22 For the following reasons, the Court finds issuance of the new case documents and Plaintiff’s 23 application to proceed in forma pauperis appropriate. 24 I. Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 25 The Court may authorize the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.