Gurpinder Singh v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GURPINDER SINGH, No. 1:25-cv-1629 DJC AC P 11 Petitioner, 12 v. ORDER 13 WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 Petitioner, a self-represented immigration detainee, filed a petition for a writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 18 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the 19 costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 21 The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the 22 Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 In light of the complexity of the 23 legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require the appointment 24 of counsel for petitioner and petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel will be granted. See 25 18 U.S.C. §…