Guardian Alliance Technologies, Inc. v. Miller Mendel, Inc. and Tyler Miller
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 GUARDIAN ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, No. 2:22-cv-01390 WBS AC
INC.,
13 Plaintiff, 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 15 JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND MILLER MENDEL, INC. and TYLER DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY 16 MILLER, THE SCHEDULING ORDER 17 Defendants. 18 19 ----oo0oo---- 20 Defendants Miller Mendel, Inc. and Tyler Miller 21 (collectively, “MMI”) move to modify the scheduling order to 22 permit them to amend their answer. As the most recent scheduling 23 order (Docket No. 64) did not supply a deadline for amending the 24 pleadings, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 applies. See Dhillon v. Princess 25 Cruise Lines, Ltd., No. 22-55125, 2023 WL 5696529 (9th Cir. Sept. 26 5, 2023); VIA Techs., Inc. v. ASUS Computer Int’l, No. 14-cv- 27 03585-BLF, 2017 WL 491172, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2017) 28 (“Where, as here, the…