Anthony Herrera v. Lynch et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20252:24-cv-01660California1,467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY HERRERA, No. 2:24-cv-01660 DJC CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LYNCH et al., Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are plaintiff’s unopposed motion to compel and unopposed motion to compel the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) to make copies. (ECF Nos. 52, 56.) For the following reason, plaintiff’s motions are denied. II. BACKGROUND Pursuant to the Discovery and Scheduling Order filed May 5, 2025, the discovery deadline was August 29, 2025 and all requests for discovery were to be served not later than sixty days prior to that date, i.e. June 30, 2025. (ECF No. 44 at 5.) Responses to discovery requests were due forty-five days after the request was served. (Id.) On August 25, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion for a sixty-day extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.