Johny Arafiles v. Grocery Outlet

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20252:24-cv-03281California1,551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHNY ARAFILES, Case No. 2:24-cv-03281-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO

v. PROSECUTE GROCERY OUTLET, Defendant. 16 On November 25, 2024, Plaintiff Johny Arafiles, proceeding without the aid of counsel, filed a Complaint against Defendant Grocery Outlet and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On April 10, 2025, Plaintiff’s IFP application was denied without prejudice for being unsigned and Plaintiff was granted twenty-one (21) days to pay the filing fee or file a complete and signed IFP application. (ECF No. 3.) On May 1, 2025, Plaintiff paid the filing fee and was provided a summons and initial scheduling order by the Clerk of Court. (ECF Nos. 4, 5.) The initial scheduling order stated: Plaintiff shall complete service of process on all Defendants named in the complaint within 90 days from the date of this order.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.