Macomber

Frank Orlando Wells v. Jeffery Macomber, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20252:25-cv-00521California1,701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK ORLANDO WELLS, No. 2:25-cv-0521 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFFERY MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion to reinstate default judgment and strike defendants’ waiver, and defendants’ motion to opt out of the Post Screening ADR Project are before the Court. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion is denied, and defendants’ motion to opt out is granted. In addition, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND On September 11, 2025, the Court screened plaintiff’s complaint and ordered service on defendants. (ECF No. 8.) On October 6, 2025, defendants filed a notice of intent to waive service. (ECF No. 13.) On October 8, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 14.) On October 15, 2025, the Court denied, without prejudice, plaintiff’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.