Miranda

Stanley W. Mundy v. Teauna Miranda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20252:25-cv-01182California461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 2:25-cv-1182 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

TEAUNA MIRANDA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, paid the filing fee, and filed a motion for a stay and abeyance. ECF Nos. 6, 7. On October 9, 2025, the undersigned issued an order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). ECF No. 8. Petitioner was given thirty days from the date of service of the order to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed. Id. at 9. Petitioner was warned that failure to show cause would result in the recommendation for dismissal pursuant to Younger and that the motion for stay and abeyance be denied as moot. Id. Petitioner was also informed that he could alternatively seek voluntary dismissal of his petition pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.