Miranda

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 2:25-cv-1182 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

14 TEAUNA MIRANDA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, paid the filing fee, and filed a motion for a stay and 19 abeyance. ECF Nos. 6, 7. On October 9, 2025, the undersigned issued an order to show cause 20 why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). ECF 21 No. 8. Petitioner was given thirty days from the date of service of the order to show cause why 22 the petition should not be dismissed. Id. at 9. Petitioner was warned that failure to show cause 23 would result in the recommendation for dismissal pursuant to Younger and that the motion for 24 stay and abeyance be denied as moot. Id. Petitioner was also informed that he could alternatively 25 seek voluntary dismissal of his petition pursuant to…