Haddad
Dominique Zafir Casey v. Haddad, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-KES-SKO (PC)
11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
12 v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL AND
REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
13 HADDAD, et al., (Doc. 66) 14 Defendants.
15 16 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 17 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s constitutional 18 claims against Defendants Castro, Fernandez, and Haddad. 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 The Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order on September 18, 2024. (Doc. 60.) 21 On March 20, 2025, Defendants filed their first Motion to Compel and Request for Sanctions, (Doc. 22 64), which the Court granted in part, (Doc. 66). In the Court’s order granting the first Motion to 23 Compel and Request for Sanctions, the Court ordered Plaintiff to “sit for a second deposition” and 24 “respond to request numbers 5 and 6…