Haddad

Dominique Zafir Casey v. Haddad, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20251:21-cv-00855California5,092 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-KES-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO COMPEL AND

REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

HADDAD, et al., (Doc. 66) Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s constitutional claims against Defendants Castro, Fernandez, and Haddad. I. INTRODUCTION The Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order on September 18, 2024. (Doc. 60.) On March 20, 2025, Defendants filed their first Motion to Compel and Request for Sanctions, (Doc. 64), which the Court granted in part, (Doc. 66). In the Court’s order granting the first Motion to Compel and Request for Sanctions, the Court ordered Plaintiff to “sit for a second deposition” and “respond to request numbers 5 and 6…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.