Guerrero

William Tanielian v. J. Guerrero

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20251:23-cv-01384California3,355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM TANIELIAN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01384-KES-CDB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

FOLLOWING SCREENING OF

v. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

J. GUERRERO, 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendant. 16 Plaintiff William Tanielian is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. BACKGROUND On December 12, 2023, the formerly assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff was directed to complete and return a Notice on How to Proceed form within 14 days and was advised that if he chose to file a first amended complaint, he must do so no later than January 11, 2024. (Id. at 10.) On December 26, 2023, Plaintiff filed both the notice (Doc. 11) and a first amended complaint (Doc. 12). On October 6, 2025, this action was reassigned to the undersigned as the referred magistrate judge. (Doc. 14.) // II. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.