Stohl

David Arthur Deponte v. Stohl, Stern, J. Saucedo, K. Sudano, M. Dobe, Gunsaga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20251:24-cv-00695California832 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ARTHUR DEPONTE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00695-KES-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

REPLY OR ADVISE IF MOTION IS MOOT

13 v.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

14 STOHL, STERN, J. SAUCEDO, K. CONSTURED MOTION

SUDANO, M. DOBE, GUNSAGA, TO SEAL

15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 71, 75) 16

DECEMBER 15, 2025 DEADLINE

17 18 19 On October 10, 2025, Plaintiff filed a second motion seeking to enforce the global 20 settlement agreement he reached with the California Department of Corrections (“CDCR”) in this 21 action. (Doc. No. 71). Plaintiff claims that he has not received the settlement payment as agreed 22 by the parties at a settlement conference and requests that the court enforce the terms of the 23 settlement agreement. (Id. at 1). 24 On November 21, 2025, Defendants filed a status report and opposition to Plaintiff’s 25 motion. (Doc. No. 76). Therein, Defendants advise that payment of the settlement amount had 26 been paid by the accounting office to Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.