Chapa

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICAH TAFARI KEYES-ANDERSON, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00077-SKO 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

13 v. DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING SCREENING

14 A. CHAPA, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

15 Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

16

17 Plaintiff Micah Tafari Keyes-Anderson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 On September 29, 2025, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 10.) It found 21 Plaintiff stated cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Chapa, 22 Luna, Salazar, Aguilar, Gamboa-Campos, Bravo-Rodriguez, Valero, and Cruz but failed to state 23 any other claims against any other named defendant. (Id. at 3-9.) Plaintiff was directed to do one 24 of the following within 21 days: (1) notify the Court he did not wish to file a first amended 25 complaint and…