Campose

Christopher Elliott v. M. Campose

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20252:22-cv-01236California4,397 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER ELLIOTT, No. 2:22-CV-1236-KJM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 M. CAMPOSE, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. See 19 ECF No. 44. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, see ECF No. 46, and Defendant has filed a reply, 20 see ECF No. 48. Also before the Court is Defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions. See 21 ECF No. 49. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, see ECF No. 50, and Defendant has filed a reply, 22 see ECF No. 51. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion for 23 summary judgment is dispositive of the case on the merits. The Court, therefore, does not reach 24 Defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions, which the Court will recommend be denied as 25 moot. 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.