Campose

Christopher Elliott v. M. Campose

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20252:22-cv-01236California4,397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER ELLIOTT, No. 2:22-CV-1236-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. CAMPOSE, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. See ECF No. 44. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, see ECF No. 46, and Defendant has filed a reply, see ECF No. 48. Also before the Court is Defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions. See ECF No. 49. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, see ECF No. 50, and Defendant has filed a reply, see ECF No. 51. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is dispositive of the case on the merits. The Court, therefore, does not reach Defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions, which the Court will recommend be denied as moot. / / / / / / / / / The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.