Fisher

Herbert Huber v. Fisher, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20252:25-cv-01311California505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HERBERT HUBER, No. 2:25-cv-1311-DC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER FISHER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Herbert Huber proceeds without counsel and seeks relief for an alleged violation of his Fourth Amendment rights based on the seizure of his vehicle. On September 24, 2025, the undersigned determined service of the first amended complaint was appropriate for Officer Fisher and ordered plaintiff to supply the U.S. Marshal with the information needed to effectuate service of process within 30 days. Within 10 days after that, plaintiff was to file a statement with the court indicating the Marshal has the documents. Plaintiff was specifically cautioned that failure to comply with that order could result in any appropriate sanctions, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The time granted has expired and plaintiff has not filed a statement with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.