Nordtrom
Mark Edward Stricklen v. Nordstrom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK EDWARD STRICKLEN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00719-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO
v. PROSECUTE NORDSTROM, FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 16 I. Background Plaintiff Mark Edward Stricklen (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 6, 2025, the Court issued an order reassigning this case from Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin to the undersigned for all further proceedings. (ECF No. 14.) On October 22, 2025, that order was returned as “Undeliverable, Inactive, Discharged, Return to Sender, Refused, Unable to Forward.” Plaintiff’s notice of change of address was therefore due on or before November 21, 2025. Local Rule 183(b). The Court’s October 10, 2025 order finding that Plaintiff may proceed on cognizable claim and October 14, 2025, order…