Wheat

Steve Wheat v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20251:22-cv-01524California171 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 | STEVE WHEAT, Case No. 1:22-cv-01524-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET

12 v. TO REFLECT STIPULATED DISMISSAL 13 | WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., (ECF No. 99) 14 Defendant. 15 □□ On November 26, 2025, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice. 16 (ECF No. 9.) In light of the stipulation, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 17 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); see Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 18 dismissed pursuant to the terms of the stipulation. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE the file in this case and 20 adjust the docket to reflect the stipulated dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a). 21 22 | IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 og. Dated: _ December 1, 2025 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.