CDCR

Christian Lopez v. CDCR, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20251:24-cv-00729California1,407 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTIAN LOPEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00729-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS DOE

13 v. DEFENDANT WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

14 CDCR, et al., PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO OBEY

15 Defendants. COURT ORDERS 16 Doc. 30 17 18 Plaintiff Christian Lopez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On January 23, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order finding that 22 plaintiff’s second amended complaint stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference to 23 safety against an unknown defendant at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State 24 Prison, Corcoran (“SATF”). Doc. 18. The magistrate judge’s order allowed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.