CDCR
Christian Lopez v. CDCR, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTIAN LOPEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00729-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS DOE
13 v. DEFENDANT WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
14 CDCR, et al., PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO OBEY
15 Defendants. COURT ORDERS 16 Doc. 30 17 18 Plaintiff Christian Lopez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On January 23, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order finding that 22 plaintiff’s second amended complaint stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference to 23 safety against an unknown defendant at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State 24 Prison, Corcoran (“SATF”). Doc. 18. The magistrate judge’s order allowed…