Glenda Prichard v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
2 3
4 5 6 7 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 12 GLENDA PRICHARD, Case No. 1:25-cv-00471-EPG 13 Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER
REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL
14 v. SECURITY COMPLAINT 15 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 1, 17).
16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an 19 unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her 20 application for supplemental security income benefits. The parties have consented to entry of 21 final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), 22 with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 9). 23 Plaintiff presents the following issues: 24 1. The ALJ’s RFC determination is not supported by substantial evidence because 25 she failed in her duty to complete the record and obtain an opinion of Plaintiff’s RFC from a medical professional. 26 2. The ALJ failed to include work-related limitations in the RFC consistent with 27 …