Michael Bruce Anthony McPherson v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20251:25-cv-01026California412 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL BRUCE ANTHONY Case No.: 1:25-cv-01026-KES-SKO McPHERSON, 12 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY MOTION 13 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS v. PREMATURE 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (Docs. 12, 13) 15 CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17

18 19 Plaintiff Michael Bruce Anthony McPherson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in 20 this civil rights action. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 21 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On September 29, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. Doc. 12. On 23 October 21, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, 24 recommending that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied as premature. Doc. 13. 25 The findings and recommendations provided that any objections were to be filed within 14 days 26 of service. Id. at 3. On November 7, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.