Horn

Bruce Lamont Fuller v. Patwin Horn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20251:25-cv-01330California1,381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRUCE LAMONT FULLER, Case No. 1:25-cv-001330-KES-EPG-HC

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF

v. HABEAS CORPUS

PATWIN HORN, Respondent.

14 Petitioner Bruce Lamont Fuller is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Given that the petition fails to state a cognizable federal habeas claim, the undersigned recommends that the petition be dismissed. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner filed an application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition in the Ninth Circuit. On September 19, 2025, the Ninth Circuit denied the application. (ECF No. 1.) However, the Ninth Circuit found Petitioner’s supplemental application, which claims Petitioner was denied the right to a fair hearing before the California Board of Parole Hearings, “unnecessary” and ordered the clerk to “transfer the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.