Horn

Bruce Lamont Fuller v. Patwin Horn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20251:25-cv-01330California1,381 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 BRUCE LAMONT FULLER, Case No. 1:25-cv-001330-KES-EPG-HC

10 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF

11 v. HABEAS CORPUS

12 PATWIN HORN, 13 Respondent.

14 15 Petitioner Bruce Lamont Fuller is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for 16 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Given that the petition fails to state a 17 cognizable federal habeas claim, the undersigned recommends that the petition be dismissed. 18 I. 19 BACKGROUND 20 Petitioner filed an application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 21 § 2254 habeas petition in the Ninth Circuit. On September 19, 2025, the Ninth Circuit denied the 22 application. (ECF No. 1.) However, the Ninth Circuit found Petitioner’s supplemental 23 application, which claims Petitioner was denied the right to a fair hearing before the California 24 Board of Parole Hearings, “unnecessary” and ordered the clerk to “transfer the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.